• Home
  • Archive by category "Criminal Law"

Topic: Chapter 1 Case Study – The Department of Homeland Security. Every question needs to be answered in the reply and it needs to be at least 500 words. This is the book information Stojkovic, Kalinich, & Klofas. (2015). Criminal justice organizations:

Topic: Chapter 1 Case Study – The Department of Homeland Security. Every question needs to be answered in the reply and it needs to be at least 500 words. This is the book information Stojkovic, Kalinich, & Klofas. (2015). Criminal justice organizations: Administration and management – Custom (6th ed.). Florence, KY: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN: 9781305751149 How does the creation of the Department of Homeland Security affect resources traditionally designated for local criminal justice organizations?Are there too few resources to fight both terrorists and traditional criminals?Who should pay the burden for investigating, apprehending, prosecuting, convicting, sentencing, and incarcerating terrorists?Should Osama Bin Laden have been taken alive?What are the due process protection questions in light of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security?Should these due process protections matter in the fight against terrorism?

Week 10 Assignment 2 – Submit Here

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 2: Using Your Manager Skills Due Week 10 and worth 240 points Note: The companies mentioned herein are merely hypothetical organizations with characteristics developed to enable students to respond to the assignment. You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment. In this assignment, you, in the role of a risk manager at Simply Green Products, will draft a document that is commonly used in the business world—a memorandum to your boss. Simply Green Products is a $10 million company that produces biodegradable packing materials that orchards use in the Shenandoah Valley to transport their apples, peaches, and pears nationwide. Biodegradable materials are more eco-friendly because they break down into the environment. Such packing materials are marketed under the name “SafePack,” which is heavily advertised in trade journals. Simply Green Products have had the name “SafePack” imprinted on all of their packing material since 2008; however, they never filed for either state or federal trademark protection. With the movement toward more eco-friendly agricultural production, the fact that such packing materials are biodegradable provides a primary marketing advantage over non-biodegradable competitors. The company president, Shep Howard, has recently become aware of several issues that may require referral to the company’s outside counsel. Because you serve as the company’s risk manager, Howard has asked you to leverage your legal and managerial skills to draft a memorandum that addresses one (1) of the two (2) situations described below: An environmental group is asserting that SafePack materials are not biodegradable. In fact, the group claims that these materials are causing an environmental hazard that is seeping from a local landfill into a nearby stream. An environmental group, SafePack Materials Pollute, has sprung up and launched an Internet campaign geared toward compelling fruit producers to stop purchasing your packing materials. The situation at hand raises environmental issues that relate to the Clean Water Act and the Solid Waste Disposal Act. A company called Safe Choices, Inc. has accused Simply Green Products of trademark infringement, and has sent a cease and desist letter to President Howard, demanding that Simply Green Products stop using the name “SafePack”. The letter asserts that a) Safe Choices uses the SafePack name to market an emergency weather kit in the form of a backpack; and that b) Safe Choices had received a federal registration for the mark from the Patent and Trademark Office in 2002. This backpack is sold both online at safepack.com and in sporting goods stores nationwide. The letter goes on to suggest that Simply Green Product’s use of this name “constitutes a false designation of origin which is likely to confuse customers as to the source of the goods”. The intellectual property issue at hand involves the Lanham Act. For one (1) of the two (2) situations set out above, write a three to four (3-4) page memorandum to President Howard. Ensure that you address each of the questions below within your memo so that President Howard may assess whether or not Simply Green Products needs to hire outside counsel to address the matter at hand. Discuss the elements that must be present in order for one to prove a valid claim under the law(s) specified (i.e., the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or the Lanham Act).Determine whether or not the activity of Simply Green Products amounts to a violation of the applicable law (i.e., the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or the Lanham Act). If you chose the environmental issue, determine whether or not seepage from your products into a stream would violate the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or both. Explain your rationale. If you chose the intellectual property matter, determine whether or not continued use of the SafePack name by your company would violate the Lanham Act. Explain your rationale.Decide whether or not President Howard should refer this chosen matter to the company’s outside counsel. Provide a rationale for your decision.Use at least three (3) high-quality academic references. As the cases discussed within the assignment are hypothetical, you will not find any solutions to them on the Internet. Further, note that Wikipedia, blogs, and such Websites as Free Dictionary do not qualify as academic resources, whereas your textbook does. Use the Strayer Learning Resource Center (LRC) to locate high-quality academic references. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. Draft this in the form of a letter that is typed, double-spaced, and uses Times New Roman font (size 12) with one-inch margins on all sides. Include your citations in the body of your letter and include your list of references at the end. All citations must follow the APA. Be sure to follow all additional instructions provided by your professor. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Describe the legal environment of business, the sources of American law, and the basis of authority for government to regulate business. Use technology and information resources to research issues in business law. Write clearly and concisely about business law using proper writing mechanics. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.

Assignment

Administrative DiscretionIn 2-3 pages answer the following:  Do you think that public administrators should be restricted to only laid down rules in the discharge of their duties as espoused by Max Weber or should they have some amount of discretion. Provide the likely benefits and disadvantages of each scenario and use examples to support your argument. (Weber is not specifically address in the readings for this unit; you will have to go back to earlier references to complete this assignment).

business law quiz

I need this in 3hours. Chapter 8 — Crimes             1.            Conduct that may be a misdemeanor in one state may be a felony in another state.              2.            A required element for a crime is that the criminal party voluntarily commits the prohibited act (think “gun to head”).             3.            A person cannot commit a crime if the person does not know that his or her conduct is criminal (think “Honduran bony fish or short lobster).             4.            The Fourth Amendment prohibits ALL government searches of businesses.             5.            Traditionally, extortion involves wrongful demands made by public officials.             6.            A company cannot be found guilty of a crime that is committed by its agent.             7.            If an employee wrongfully keeps money that was entrusted to the employee by his or employer, the employee has committed the crime of embezzlement.             8.            Government officers do not need a search warrant in order to inspect property that is in “plain view”.             9.            The Constitution guarantees individuals the right to a speedy trial in criminal cases.             10.            The Digital Millennium Copyright Act allows a person to thwart encryption devices that copy right holders place on copyrighted material if the person has purchased the copyrighted item in question.    Chapter  9 — Torts             11.            One wrongful act may be both a crime and a tort.             12.            A person is not entitled to recover for EVERY injury or loss that is caused by another person.             13.            In general, tort liability will not be imposed for an involuntary act even if the act harms another.             14.            Under tort law, one owes a duty to society to conform his or her conduct to a required standard (think: does society sue the tortfeasor does the “somebody done me wrong” individual plaintiff sue the tortfeasor?).             15.            The U.S. government cannot be sued for harm caused by the negligence of federal employees.             16.            In some states, a plaintiff may recover for emotional distress that is negligently caused by another.             17.            Companies can now make commercial use of the name or likeness of celebrities without first obtaining the celebrities permission to do so because most states do not recognize the tort of invasion of the right to publicity.  Chapter 10 18.          Patents are granted by state governments, not by the federal government.19.          Trademarks may be protected for up to three years prior to the time that they are actually used. 20.            A “term” acquires a secondary meaning when, through prolonged use, the public has come to associate that term with a particular product. 21.            In general, mere ideas and concepts cannot be copyrighted or patented. 22.               A trade secret may be disclosed without losing its legal protection if it is restrictively disclosed to another person who was aware of its secret nature.23.               In general, a competitor is legally entitled to “reverse engineer” or copy a product if the product is sold to the public and the product has not been copyrighted or patented.24.               A patent grants the exclusive right to use and sell the patented item for 17 years.25.               Copyright infringement of programs is determined by focusing on the number of steps program share in common and NOT by focusing on the similarity between significant program steps.26.               Federal law expressly prohibits the pending of any computer programs.27.               A patent that has been issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may be invalidated if a party can prove in litigation that the patented invention would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art.  Chapter 11 28.               Conduct on the Internet is subject to traditional rules of law as well as new  statutes and case law relating to cyberspace activities.29.               Communications sent via the Internet are not protected by the U.S. Constitution.30.               Phishing and pharming are criminal uses of computers by which unscrupulous individuals obtain private financial information of innocent parties.31.               Employers do not have a right to look at employees’ e-mail when it is communicated via the employer’s e-mail system.32.               The Fourth Amendment prohibits the government from conducting unreasonable searches of a person’s computer.33.               Due process requires that a party being sued has a  “nexus” with a state before it can be sued in that state.34.               The United States Supreme Court has held that entering into a contract with a person in another state via the Internet is a sufficient connection to constitutionally justify being sued in that state.35.               Federal securities law may apply to stock transactions conducted via the Internet.36.               Federal intellectual property law is not apply to the World Wide Web.37.               Congress recently enacted statute that makes a federal crime for a web site to gather and disclosed any information regarding a customer, regardless of their age, without first obtaining the customers consent to such disclosure.  Chapter 12 38.               Every agreement is a valid, legally binding contract.39.               Contracts may relate to virtually any type of legal transaction, including performing services.40.               Individuals and corporations can make contracts, but government agencies cannot.41.               In general, agreement is not a legally binding contract unless the parties sufficiently indicate an intent to be legally bound by the terms of the agreement.             42.            The Electronic Signature is in Global and National Commerce Act and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act generally providethat electronic contracts are as valid as traditional ink signed paper contracts. 43.         Informal contracts are not legally binding.44.         An option contract is a contract that gives one party the right or choice to accept an existing offer within a stated period of time.45.         A right of first refusal contract gives a party the right to accept an offer only if another party subsequently decides to make the offer.46.          An offeree can accept an offer for a bilateral contract by promising to perform the requested act.  A contract is formed when the offer he communicates this promise to the offeror.47.           In some cases, a party may have a duty under “QUASI CONTRACT” to pay for  benefits received even though the party never contractually agreed to pay for such benefits.48.            QUASI CONTRACT requires that a person must pay for any benefit that is ever received from another.    49.            If a party enters into an express contract agreed to perform services for a stated price, then that party is entitled to recover only that amount; the party is not entitled to quasi — contract will recovery for the reasonable value of such services.  50.            The Starbucks trademark infringement cease and desist letter and subsequent response from Exit Six Brewery were funny, but quite illustrative of the issues involved in protection of a profitable and widely known trademark.