Below is a scenario for you to analyze with your group. Draft a concise response (not to exceed 2 paragraphs) which incorporates the chapter discussion on awards including all Federal and State legislature. Explain how the material applies to this scenario.Two brothers, both of whom are certified public accountants (CPAs), form a professional association to provide tax-accounting services to the public. They also agree, in writing, that any disputes that arise between them over matters concerning the association will be submitted to an independent arbitrator, whom they designated to be their father, who is also a CPA. A dispute arises, and the matter is submitted to the father for arbitration. During the course of arbitration, which occurs over several weeks, the father asks the older brother, who is visiting one evening, to explain a certain entry in the brothers’ association accounts. The younger brother learns of the discussion at the next meeting for arbitration. He says nothing about it, however. The arbitration is concluded in favor of the older brother, who seeks a court order compelling the younger brother to comply with the award. The younger brother seeks to set aside the award, claiming that the arbitration process was tainted by bias because “Dad always liked my older brother best.” The younger brother also seeks to have the award set aside on the basis of improper conduct in that matters subject to arbitration were discussed between the father and older brother without the younger brother’s being present. Should a court confirm the award or set it aside? Why or why not?
Background InformationJonBenet Ramsey was a 6-year-old beauty queen who was found murdered in her parents’ Boulder, Colorado, home on December 26, 1996. Still unsolved, the murder led to one of the most publicized police investigations of the 1990s.Several crime scene preservation mistakes were made that day, but one of the mistakes discussed in this weeks’ studies is specifically mentioned.Can you identify that mistake?InstructionsWrite a one-page paper to share your insights, applying what you have learned from this weeks content about crime scene investigation.Additional Resources that may help with your assignment…View this short video clip: “Boulder Detective on the Ramsey Case says she knows who killed JonBenet Ramsey”Published by Karie Allison, taken from ABC News “Time Tunnel”http://youtu.be/-Aly2fPK-XE
Each week, you’ll have to post on at least three separate days to the Discussion. Each post should be of a high quality. Your first post should be by Wednesday.Here is the first question on the Discussion page:The regulation of pesticides occurs under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Pesticides are used in abundance for many different reasons, many of which, have a high risk impact to human health. Use this assignment to familiarize yourself with the risks of pesticides and the regulations that govern them. Please respond to the following:What are considered to be the reasonable and unreasonable risks of pesticides?Reviewing the list of considered pesticides in your textbook, were you surprised by any of the items? Please list the items and why you were surprised to see them categorized as a pesticide.Using the Internet, look up one case that involves pesticides. List the case name, the gist of the case, pesticide involved, and the court decision.Nonpoint source pollution (NPS) refers to a variety of sources of water pollution including fertilizer and pesticide runoff, leakage from underground storage tanks, storm water and parking lot runoffs, acid rain, vehicle fluids, road salt, trash and animal waste. NPS is the largest contributor to water pollution, but CWA regulation of these sources is minimal. Instead, states are charged with responsibility to regulate NPS.This assignment has two parts:
First, answer the following questions:Look up the Consumer Confidence Report for your local system at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/dwinfo.htm. Is there anything to worry about?Now look up information about your specific water system at http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/sdwis/sdwis_query.html. Do these two reports support or contradict one another? Do they give you confidence in the quality of your local water supply?If a community finds it impractical to meet increasingly stringent standards for a drinking water pollutant (e.g., arsenic), should it be able to retain existing standards? In your response, consider the opportunity costs for a community investing in expensive upgrading of its water treatment system.The second part of the assignment requires you to research and analyze the following case: Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. North American Galvanizing and Coatings, Inc., 05-3299 (2007)Prepare a brief of the case. (See the Legal Writing Resources Page for guidance.)This assignment should be free of spelling and grammar errors.You will be assessed on the nature and scope of your research and response.Your response must cite any supporting material from the text, lecture or other sources you have used to complete the assignment.You may use your text and/or Internet sources as a reference, but remember to cite all sources according to Bluebook guidelines.Submit this assignment by following this button:Post Here Back to Top
A. satisfied. B. ethical. C. criminal. D. None of the above
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 300 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments.Define the following:LibertyEqualityDemocracyExplain and express in your own words what liberty and equality mean to you.Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?What clarification do you need regarding the posting?What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
Accreditation is a cornerstone of medical law, and ensures that healthcare organizations adhere to a common code of excellence. One organization that provides healthcare accreditation is The Joint Commission. But why is The Joint Commission important in the study of Medical Law, Ethics, and Bioethics?Conduct some independent research, and in a 2 page Word document, describe the key functions that The Joint Commission provides to healthcare organizations as well as its purpose to the medical community in general.Be sure to cite any outside research sources and proofread your work prior to its submission.APA format
What Did Sutherland Know?Edward H. Sutherland provides various definitions to white collar crime. In 2-3 pages, examine the controversy surrounding Sutherlands approach. Do you agree with Sutherland? Why or why not?Please note: APA formatting and citations rules apply to this and all essays in this course.